Table 7 Evaluation of bias risk calculation: High: 1 to 4 points. Medium: 5 to 10 points. Low: 11 to 13 points
ID Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Adequacy of follow up | Total Score | Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Representativeness of exposed cohort (⋆) | Participant selection (⋆) | (⋆⋆⋆⋆) | Assessment of outcome (⋆⋆⋆⋆⋆) | (⋆⋆) | |||
Benedetti‐Isaac, 2015 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 12 | Low |
Benedetti‐Isaac, 2021 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 11 | Low |
Benedetti-Isaac, 2023a | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 11 | Low |
Benedetti-Isaac, 2023b | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆ | 12 | Low |
Escobar Vidarte, 2022 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 12 | Low |
Franzini, 2013 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 11 | Low |
Giordano, 2016 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆ | 11 | Low |
Harat, 2021 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆ | 13 | Low |
Heiden, 2022 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 5 | Medium | |
Kakko, 2019 | ⋆ | ⋆ | 2 | High | |||
López Ríos, 2022 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆ | 13 | Low |
Maley, 2010 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 9 | Medium |
Micieli, 2017 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 9 | Medium |
Park, 2017 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆ | 9 | Medium |
Stocco, 2014 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 8 | Medium |
Sturm, 2012 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 7 | Medium |
Torres, 2013 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 8 | Medium |
Torres, 2020 | ⋆ | ⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆⋆⋆ | ⋆ | 9 | Medium |