Skip to main content

Table 5 GRADE assessment of the evidence in the meta-analysis

From: Effectiveness and safety of Tuina massage therapy for paediatric fever: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Author(s):

Question: [Tepid or Tuina massage] compared to [Antipyretic drugs] for [pediatric fever]

Setting:

Bibliography:

Certainty assessment

№ of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

№ of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

[Tepid or Tuina massage]

[Antipyretic drugs]

Relative

(95% CI)

Absolute

(95% CI)

Temperature difference

 5

randomised trials

not serious

serious

not serious

not serious

none

225

312

-

SMD 0.73 higher

(0.01 lower to 1.47 higher)

Moderate

CRITICAL

Efficacy

 10

randomised trials

not serious

serious

not serious

not serious

none

87/544 (16.0%)

138/558 (24.7%)

RR 0.63

(0.35 to 1.14)

92 fewer per 1,000

(from 161 fewer to 35 more)

Moderate

CRITICAL

  1. CI confidence interval, RR risk ratio, SMD standardised mean difference