Quality assessment | No. of patients | Result | Quality | Importance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of studies | Design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other | ||||
Diagnostic yield: FEV1 | ||||||||||
16 | Observational | No serious risk of bias | Serious* | None | None | Possibility of very large percentage of abnormal tests | 2200 | All with normal FEV1 in 3 studies Range of prevalence of abnormal: 4–41%. Severe abnormalities: 0–13% | Moderate | Important |
Diagnostic yield: FEV1/FVC | ||||||||||
13 | Observational | No serious risk of bias | Serious* | None | None | Possibility of very large percentage of abnormal tests | 909 | All with normal FEV1/FVC in 2 studies Range of abnormalities: 5–20% | Moderate | Important |
Diagnostic yield: FEF25-75% | ||||||||||
4 | Observational | No serious risk of bias | Serious* | None | None | Possibility of very large percentage of abnormal tests | 655 | Range of abnormalities: 3–28% | Moderate | Important |
Diagnostic yield: FVC | ||||||||||
10 | Observational | No serious risk of bias | Serious* | None | None | Possibility of very large percentage of abnormal tests | 1543 | All with normal FVC in 2 studies Range of abnormalities: 10–31% | Moderate | Important |
Diagnostic yield: DLCO | ||||||||||
10 | Observational | No serious risk of bias | Serious* | None | None | Possibility of very large percentage of abnormal tests | 914 | All with normal DLCO in 1 study. Range of abnormalities: 3-100% | Moderate | Important |