Sex differences in the relationship between body mass index in Chinese adolescents and future risk of hypertension: a decade-long cohort study

Table 5 The link between BMI and the risk of hypertension among all participants, male, and female adolescents in different sensitivity analyses

Model		Male (HR,95%CI) P	Female (HR,95%CI) P	Total (HR,95%CI) P
Model I	BMI (kg/m²)	1.211 (1.021, 1.436) 0.028	1.483 (0.830, 2.649) 0.183	1.229 (1.045, 1.445) 0.013
Model II	BMI (kg/m²)	1.595 (1.178, 2.159) 0.003	1.333 (0.968, 1.835) 0.179	1.347 (1.206, 1.505) < 0.001
Model III	BMI (kg/m2)	1.251 (1.174, 1.333) < 0.001	1.654 (0.822, 3.329) 0.159	1.219 (1.029, 1.444) 0.022

Model I was a sensitivity analysis conducted on participants with LDL-c < 130 mg/dL. Adjusted sex, age, LDL-c, TG, HDL-c, FPG, WC, and UA
Model II was a sensitivity analysis conducted on participants with.UA < 7.0 mg/dL. Adjusted sex, age, LDL-c, TG, HDL-c, FPG, WC, and UA
Model III was a sensitivity analysis with the follow-up time limited to a maximum of 5 years. Adjusted sex, age, LDL-c, TG, HDL-c, FPG, WC, and UA
Note: In the gender subgroup, Models I and II were not adjusted for the variable gender. HR, hazard ratio; CI: confidence

ISSN: 1471-2431