Skip to main content

Table 3 Association of parental, fetal, and neonatal factors with the “unhealthy” cluster groups.

From: Clustering unhealthy lifestyle factors in Chinese children and adolescents with overweight or obesity

Risk factor

Cluster I vs. Cluster II

Cluster III vs. Cluster II

Cluster IV vs. Cluster II

Age

 

2.021*** (1.953, 2.091)

0.655*** (0.624, 0.687)

2.181*** (2.090, 2.276)

Sex

Boys

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 

Girls

0.765*** (0.684, 0.855)

1.231** (1.087, 1.394)

0.994 (0.846, 1.167)

Delivery mode

Vaginal delivery

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 

Cesarean section

1.178** (1.055, 1.315)

0.686*** (0.606, 0.777)

1.208* (1.028, 1.420)

Assisted reproduction

No

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 

Yes

0.550** (0.360, 0.839)

0.634 (0.395, 1.017)

1.006 (0.589, 1.716)

Twins

No

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 

Yes

0.902 (0.624, 1.303)

1.096 (0.736, 1.630)

0.759 (0.425, 1.356)

Infancy feeding

Pure breastfeeding

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 

Partial breastfeeding

0.783*** (0.696, 0.880)

0.718*** (0.628, 0.820)

0.767** (0.644, 0.913)

 

Non-breastfeeding

1.331** (1.087, 1.628)

0.884 (0.695, 1.124)

1.410* (1.070, 1.858)

Full-term birth

Yes

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 

No

1.034 (0.865, 1.237)

0.891 (0.723, 1.098)

1.034 (0.797, 1.342)

Maternal age

 

1.187*** (1.170, 1.205)

1.006 (0.990, 1.022)

1.197*** (1.173, 1.221)

Paternal age

 

1.157*** (1.142, 1.173)

1.028*** (1.013, 1.044)

1.173*** (1.152, 1.194)

Maternal overweight/obesity

No

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 

Yes

1.360*** (1.217, 1.520)

0.602*** (0.529, 0.687)

1.499*** (1.273, 1.763)

Paternal overweight/obesity

No

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 

Yes

1.535*** (1.349, 1.747)

0.909 (0.793, 1.043)

1.673*** (1.371, 2.042)

  1. Abbreviations: Ref., reference group
  2. Data are expressed as odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
  3. Multinomial logistic regression model for the association of fetal and neonatal factors with the membership to unhealthy lifestyle factors
  4. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001