Skip to main content

Table 1 Methodological quality assessment of studies using JBI critical appraisal checklist for case series studies

From: Perforated peptic ulcers in children: a systematic review

JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series Studies

Bülbül and Şalcı, 2024. [15]

Wang et al., 2023. [16]

Shen et al., 2023. [17]

Sayan et al., 2021. [18]

Yan et al., 2019. [19)

Reusens et al., 2016. [20]

Wong et al., 2015. [21]

Yildiz et al., 2014. [22]

Hua et al., 2007. [23]

Wong et al., 2006. [24]

Edwards et al., 2005. [25]

Dunn et al., 1983. [26]

Q1

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q2

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

U

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q3

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

U

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q4

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q5

Yes

Yes

Yes

U

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q6

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q7

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q8

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

U

U

U

No

No

Yes

No

Q9

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Q10

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

NA

Yes

NA

Yes

NA

The overall quality assessment score

90%

90%

100%

60%

100%

60%

90%

80%

90%

80%

100%

80%

Methodological quality of study

H

H

H

M

H

M

H

H

H

H

H

H

  1. U = Unclear, NA = Not applicable, H = high, M = medium